Should the U. S. get involved to prevent or perhaps end violations of individual rights (including genocide) in foreign countries when these types of violations do not directly affect different American interests?
The United States can be described as growing global power and presence. Almost every other countries aren't. We are often called upon to interact in conflict scenarios like preventing violations of human rights and genocide. Intervening just where the national curiosity is concerned might only bring about negative reactions, which could challenge our performance and especially our international trustworthiness. Therefore , the U. T. should strive to intervene in and prevent infractions of man rights not merely where we now have other interests but in most other circumstances.
The U. S i9000. should see itself because the planet's policeman in an increasingly felony world, just like other countries see it and thus seek to get involved in such situations. The U. S. is thought to be a legitimate country in which the law reigns supreme and in which infringement on human rights is firmly prohibited by the law and so the rest of the universe has a purpose to admire the U. S. to aid prevent any such violation of human privileges in their countries as well in the event the need develops, regardless of whether national interest is at stake or perhaps not, as well as the U. S. had a obligation to do just that. As we have emerged in this " shadow of superiority" in this present day and time, we now have a duty to aid whenever the necessity arises in weaker countries in which genocide of violation of human privileges is engaged to preserve global peace.
Also, the U. S. should get involved whether national interest are participating or not because this is going to continue to ensure that the U. S. plays a major position in surrounding other countries foreign plan and remaining a key person in world politics. Editor and Author, Robert Kagan preserves in his publication, " American Power В– A guide intended for the perplexed" that American " national interests" must be interpreted commonly to take into account the country's...